Time Warner and “Content Anywhere”

Share Button

In early May, Time Warner Inc. announced that it has purchased the websites Flixster and Rotten Tomatoes. Flixster is the world’s most popular movie community in social media. Over the past month, Time Warner has indicated that they will play a major role in the future of video distribution.

On May 25th, Time Warner CFO John Martin announced at Barclay’s 2011 Global Communications, Media and Technology Conference that Flixster will serve as an essential “front end that will be plugged into UltraViolet.” The UltraViolet system, as mentioned in earlier posts, is pegged as the film industry’s main catalyst to give consumers the ability to access their purchased videos on a variety of devices, increasing the value of content, and movie producers believe that this added value will promote the purchase over the rental of content.

While Time Warner has historically been criticized as a slow adopter of new technological trends in distribution, the combination of UltraViolet and Flixster will make Time Warner a major force in the promotion the “content anywhere” concept.

Along with its role in UltraViolet, Time Warner was also behind one of the first “content anywhere” video systems with HBO Go. HBO Go allows HBO subscribers to access all the episodes of HBO original programming, movies, and other content from a computer, tablet, or smartphone. This revolutionary system brings popular TV shows and movies beyond the DVD and Blu-ray box sets, and on to their Internet-connected mobile devices.

While Martin only literally spends a minute discussing Flixster and UltraViolet at the conference, he provided numerous hints to their roles in the digital age, but he also raised a couple of questions on how the future will look.

For starters, Martin mentioned that Flixster users would be able to upload their movies to Flixster. This ability directly contradicts what UltraViolet is set up to do, i.e. be a cloud-based system where the movies are already there and you only purchase the right to access them.

I believe this statement indicates one of two things: Martin misspoke using the wrong verb to describe the process (however this seems unlikely since he seemed to be very conscious of how he describes things) or Flixster will provide this ability as a complement to UltraViolet’s features. If this upload ability is true, many of us will be wasting numerous hours uploading our video libraries; however, on the bright side, I will not have to buy “The Godfather” for the fourth time.

Another peculiar statement that caught my attention was that consumers would be able to buy or rent a movie at the click of a button. The ability to rent movies with a single click would allow Time Warner to compete directly with Amazon’s Instant Video and YouTube and indirectly with Netflix and Hulu. The advantage of Flixster over these other services is that it is in the middle of the social media world and it’s focused on films.

Along with Steve Jobs’ announcement of the iCloud a few days ago, it appears “content anywhere” is coming. The next major battle in the film distribution world is where people will store their movies and how.

About Arthur Pignotti

Before joining CD-Info in 2010, Pignotti worked as a video editor, a multimedia designer, and a multimedia development manager at US Digital Media for 6 years. He has two BAs in journalism and history from Arizona State University and will be receiving an MA in history from Arizona State next year.
This entry was posted in Industry News, Time Warner, Ultra Violet Video Format, UltraViolet and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Time Warner and “Content Anywhere”

  1. Samm says:

    You wrote “Along with its role in UltraViolet, Time Warner was also behind one of the first “content anywhere” video systems with HBO Go”.

    Just where are you getting your information? You are wrong. Despite friends having HBO Go weeks ago, Time Warner has refused to carry it, and TW HBO subscribers are left with nothing. I pay a sizable chunk of change to TW: 4 TV’s, 3 of which carry 2 premium channels. The price for the same services keeps going up, but we get nothing new for it. TW doesn’t even bother to respond to its customers’ email about the subject.

    I’m more than a little fed up with their blase attitude towards their customers. We can get Fios, and I’ve heard they have made improvements with satellites in terms of getting signals with not-spectacular southern exposure. I’m going to see about switching. Some other content provider can get my approximately $1,680 per year.

    • Arthur Laszlo says:

      Just to clarify. Time Warner Inc owns HBO, but NOT Time Warner Cable, which is the company that is drawing your ire. Now, that may sound insane, but Time Warner Cable was spun off into a separate company from Time Warner Inc in March 2009. Sorry for the confusion. It is my fault for not being as specific as possible when using the Time Warner name. However, I can definitely understand your frustration with Time Warner Cable since it is the largest cable television company to not allow HBO Go.

Comments are closed.